<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Building a Better User Experience - Vista</title>
    <link>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/</link>
    <description>A weblog authored by Keith Rome, with a focus on the User Experience.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Keith Rome</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:46:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>krome@wintellect.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>krome@wintellect.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=e62d8fa0-1b92-4906-aff2-8fbd0b25a501</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/PermaLink,guid,e62d8fa0-1b92-4906-aff2-8fbd0b25a501.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Keith Rome</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/CommentView,guid,e62d8fa0-1b92-4906-aff2-8fbd0b25a501.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=e62d8fa0-1b92-4906-aff2-8fbd0b25a501</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I have been running a Media Center PC as the hub of my home media network for a few
years now - first MCE 2005 and then VMC (Vista Media Center) once it became available.
In fact, I am about to install my 3rd XBOX 360 in my house (I use those as media extenders
wherever I have a TV). I love my media setup - and more importantly - so does my wife.
</p>
        <p>
I pretty much just let things run and don't think too often about it... but this week
I ran across this completely awesome application which makes my setup even better... <a href="http://www.lifextender.com/">Lifextender</a>.
</p>
        <p>
Lifextender has a very simple premise, which is stated on the home page of it's website:
"Lifextender is a dead-simple commercial-removal application". The program basically
runs in the background where it monitors your system for new recordings. It then analyzes
those recordings and removes any commercial pods that it finds. It is pretty good
- I would say the success rate is about 95%. When it makes it mistake, it seems to
always err on the side of caution and has never removed something I didn't want it
to. The modified recordings are about 75% of the size of of the originals - which
means it is literally giving me back 15 minutes of my life for every "hour" of commercial-infested
programming that I watch.
</p>
        <p>
And oh did I mention - It's also FREE (free as in beer)!
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/aggbug.ashx?id=e62d8fa0-1b92-4906-aff2-8fbd0b25a501" />
      </body>
      <title>Awesome tool for Media Center - Lifextender</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/PermaLink,guid,e62d8fa0-1b92-4906-aff2-8fbd0b25a501.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/2008/04/03/AwesomeToolForMediaCenterLifextender.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I have been running a Media Center PC as the hub of my home media network for a few
years now - first MCE 2005 and then VMC (Vista Media Center) once it became available.
In fact, I am about to install my 3rd XBOX 360 in my house (I use those as media extenders
wherever I have a TV). I love my media setup - and more importantly - so does my wife.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I pretty much just let things run and don't think too often about it... but this week
I ran across this completely awesome application which makes my setup even better... &lt;a href="http://www.lifextender.com/"&gt;Lifextender&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Lifextender has a very simple premise, which is stated on the home page of it's website:
"Lifextender is a dead-simple commercial-removal application". The program basically
runs in the background where it monitors your system for new recordings. It then analyzes
those recordings and removes any commercial pods that it finds. It is pretty good
- I would say the success rate is about 95%. When it makes it mistake, it seems to
always err on the side of caution and has never removed something I didn't want it
to. The modified recordings are about 75% of the size of of the originals - which
means it is literally giving me back 15 minutes of my life for every "hour" of commercial-infested
programming that I watch.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And oh did I mention - It's also FREE (free as in beer)!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/aggbug.ashx?id=e62d8fa0-1b92-4906-aff2-8fbd0b25a501" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/CommentView,guid,e62d8fa0-1b92-4906-aff2-8fbd0b25a501.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
      <category>Media</category>
      <category>Tips and Tricks</category>
      <category>Vista</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=d5d81e95-3752-41f5-9b2b-b7a13b9c414f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/PermaLink,guid,d5d81e95-3752-41f5-9b2b-b7a13b9c414f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Keith Rome</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/CommentView,guid,d5d81e95-3752-41f5-9b2b-b7a13b9c414f.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=d5d81e95-3752-41f5-9b2b-b7a13b9c414f</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
A few weeks ago, for no obvious reason, I lost the ability to multi-select files in
Windows Explorer. Control-Click, Shift-Click, Control-A, none of those hotkeys would
work. The mouse "rubber band" selection tool was non-functional, and even the corresponding
selection options from the View menu were disabled.
</p>
        <p>
I never realized how dependant I was on the multi-selection feature. Tasks that were
normally simple were suddenly monumental. Lucky for me, a little bit of <a href="http://www.live.com/">Live
Searching</a> helped me find a solution: apparently the per-folder settings that Explorer
likes to save can get corrupted. The fix is to delete the folder settings data. For
some people, you can simply go to Folder Options under the Tools menu, and click the
button to "Reset Folders". That didn't work for me though. I had to manually delete
the folder settings data from the registry.
</p>
        <p>
          <em>
            <strong>Warning: Messing with the Registry is Bad mmmkay</strong>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p>
At this key location, you can find a few sub-keys filled with lots of nasty gobbledy-gook
data values and nested sub-keys:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
            <font face="Courier New" size="2">
              <strong>HKCU\Software\Classes\Local Settings\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\</strong>
            </font>
          </p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
Deleting the <font face="Courier New" size="3"><strong>BagMRU</strong></font> and <font face="Courier New" size="3"><strong>Bags</strong></font> subkeys
here (and obviously all of their contents) corrected the problem for me (for now). 
</p>
        <p>
Your mileage may vary. <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/aggbug.ashx?id=d5d81e95-3752-41f5-9b2b-b7a13b9c414f" /></p>
      </body>
      <title>Multi-selection of files in Explorer (Vista)</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/PermaLink,guid,d5d81e95-3752-41f5-9b2b-b7a13b9c414f.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/2007/11/16/MultiselectionOfFilesInExplorerVista.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
A few weeks ago, for no obvious reason, I lost the ability to multi-select files in
Windows Explorer. Control-Click, Shift-Click, Control-A, none of those hotkeys would
work. The mouse "rubber band" selection tool was non-functional, and even the corresponding
selection options from the View menu were disabled.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I never realized how dependant I was on the multi-selection feature. Tasks that were
normally simple were suddenly monumental. Lucky for me, a little bit of &lt;a href="http://www.live.com/"&gt;Live
Searching&lt;/a&gt; helped me find a solution: apparently the per-folder settings that Explorer
likes to save can get corrupted. The fix is to delete the folder settings data. For
some people, you can simply go to Folder Options under the Tools menu, and click the
button to "Reset Folders". That didn't work for me though. I had to manually delete
the folder settings data from the registry.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Warning: Messing with the Registry is Bad mmmkay&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
At this key location, you can find a few sub-keys filled with lots of nasty gobbledy-gook
data values and nested sub-keys:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HKCU\Software\Classes\Local Settings\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Deleting the &lt;font face="Courier New" size="3"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BagMRU&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt; and &lt;font face="Courier New" size="3"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bags&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt; subkeys
here (and obviously all of their contents) corrected the problem for me (for now). 
&lt;p&gt;
Your mileage may vary. &lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/aggbug.ashx?id=d5d81e95-3752-41f5-9b2b-b7a13b9c414f" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/CommentView,guid,d5d81e95-3752-41f5-9b2b-b7a13b9c414f.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
      <category>Vista</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=de3dd212-1e90-48cf-9bb6-4fbbfd899ba8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/PermaLink,guid,de3dd212-1e90-48cf-9bb6-4fbbfd899ba8.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Keith Rome</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/CommentView,guid,de3dd212-1e90-48cf-9bb6-4fbbfd899ba8.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=de3dd212-1e90-48cf-9bb6-4fbbfd899ba8</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I have been using Vista RC1 and now RC2 (havent loaded RTM yet) for a while. I have
liked the interface and speed (yeah - it's actually faster than XP was on my laptop).
I have also been getting used to some of the "weirdness" such as the new explorer
interface and control panel wizards. Overall I think its a good O/S, but nothing has
really made me say Wow. Until today.
</p>
        <p>
Background: My old printer, a DeskJet 895Cse finally died on me, and my fax machine
has been unreliable for years. So I decided to just get one of those "all in one"
printer, fax, copier, scanner do-hickeys. I picked up an OfficeJet 6310 from Fry's.
I really had low expectations for the thing. With a price under $200, I really wasnt
expecting anything more than a crappy install experience.
</p>
        <p>
So here I go. Power it on. Plug it into the ethernet hub. Installation works fine
on my wife's XP laptop. Then for the real test - I inserted the install disc into
my Vista machine. As expected, the installer freaks out and refuses to run. A quick
check on the HP website confirms that there are no public drivers for Vista yet. I
didnt really expect to find any, to be honest. I even fired off a quick email to support
to inquire about Vista drivers. To my surprise, I got a reply within 10 minutes. And
it wasnt just "so sorry, vista not supported"... they actually gave me a workaround
using an older XP driver for another printer that was compatible enough to enable
simple printing - if I was OK with connecting via USB. Which I didnt want to do.
</p>
        <p>
But that got me thinking... I wonder if I can convince the printer to work as a regular
TCP/IP print server. I have configured plenty of LPR ports in 2000/XP, so I figured
maybe I could get a few of the config parameters right by guessing, and coax it into
working for me.
</p>
        <p>
First thing that came to mind - I remembered being surprised by the network browsing
support in Vista a few weeks ago when I noticed how it detected my router, and even
knew that it had an admin page (hth did it know that?). Just browsing the "Network"
desktop icon had revealed that the usability team has been hard at work improving
the previously horrible network browser feature. With that experience in mind, I tried
a quick network browse to see if Vista would spot the new printer out there. I was
amazed to see that not only did it spot the printer, but it also knew that it supported
a web-based admin page (I didnt even know the printer had that feature!).
</p>
        <p>
Seeing that Vista obviously was playing very well with the printer as a networking
peer, I figured I might as well try my luck with adding the TCP/IP printer port. I
was very surprised to discover that what used to be a tedious and easy-to-screw-up
process was now very streamlined... I simply went to Add New Printer, chose Locally
Attached, and then Add New TCP/IP Port. So far, pretty much what I expected. Then
on the next wizard page it asks for the printer's IP address. I thought "cool, it
looks like it will be smart about prompting for the port config details".
</p>
        <p>
Clicked Next and totally expected to see a screen full of configuration settings and
printer queue names, etc. Instead, the wizard asked if I would like to let it try
and figure things out on its own. Nah, it won't work. But I try it anyways... Trying
to locate printer... Found printer... detecting manufacturer... detecting model...
installing drivers... finished - would you like to print a test page?
</p>
        <p>
Wow. I am totally impressed with how well this worked. Network printer configuration
used to be a royal pain in 2000 and XP. Sometimes it's the little things like this
that make a difference.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/aggbug.ashx?id=de3dd212-1e90-48cf-9bb6-4fbbfd899ba8" />
      </body>
      <title>Fun with Vista</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/PermaLink,guid,de3dd212-1e90-48cf-9bb6-4fbbfd899ba8.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/2006/11/22/FunWithVista.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I have been using Vista RC1 and now RC2 (havent loaded RTM yet) for a while. I have
liked the interface and speed (yeah - it's actually faster than XP was on my laptop).
I have also been getting used to some of the "weirdness" such as the new explorer
interface and control panel wizards. Overall I think its a good O/S, but nothing has
really made me say Wow. Until today.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Background: My old printer, a DeskJet 895Cse finally died on me, and my fax machine
has been unreliable for years. So I decided to just get one of those "all in one"
printer, fax, copier, scanner do-hickeys. I picked up an OfficeJet 6310 from Fry's.
I really had low expectations for the thing. With a price under $200, I really wasnt
expecting anything more than a crappy install experience.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So here I go. Power it on. Plug it into the ethernet hub. Installation works fine
on my wife's XP laptop. Then for the real test - I inserted the install disc into
my Vista machine. As expected, the installer freaks out and refuses to run. A quick
check on the HP website confirms that there are no public drivers for Vista yet. I
didnt really expect to find any, to be honest. I even fired off a quick email to support
to inquire about Vista drivers. To my surprise, I got a reply within 10 minutes. And
it wasnt just "so sorry, vista not supported"... they actually gave me a workaround
using an older XP driver for another printer that was compatible enough to enable
simple printing - if I was OK with connecting via USB. Which I didnt want to do.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But that got me thinking... I wonder if I can convince the printer to work as a regular
TCP/IP print server. I have configured plenty of LPR ports in 2000/XP, so I figured
maybe I could get a few of the config parameters right by guessing, and coax it into
working for me.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
First thing that came to mind - I remembered being surprised by the network browsing
support in Vista a few weeks ago when I noticed how it detected my router, and even
knew that it had an admin page (hth did it know that?). Just browsing the "Network"
desktop icon had revealed that the usability team has been hard at work improving
the previously horrible network browser feature. With that experience in mind, I tried
a quick network browse to see if Vista would spot the new printer out there. I was
amazed to see that not only did it spot the printer, but it also knew that it supported
a web-based admin page (I didnt even know&amp;nbsp;the printer&amp;nbsp;had that feature!).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Seeing that Vista obviously was playing very well with the printer as a networking
peer, I figured I might as well try my luck with adding the TCP/IP printer port. I
was very surprised to discover that what used to be a tedious and easy-to-screw-up
process was now very streamlined... I simply went to Add New Printer, chose Locally
Attached, and then Add New TCP/IP Port. So far, pretty much what I expected. Then
on the next wizard page it asks for the printer's IP address. I thought "cool, it
looks like it will be smart about prompting for the port config details".
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Clicked Next and totally expected to see a screen full of configuration settings and
printer queue names, etc. Instead, the wizard asked if I would like to let it try
and figure things out on its own. Nah, it won't work. But I try it anyways... Trying
to locate printer... Found printer... detecting manufacturer... detecting model...
installing drivers... finished - would you like to print a test page?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Wow. I am totally impressed with how well this worked. Network printer configuration
used to be a royal pain in 2000 and XP. Sometimes it's the little things like this
that make a difference.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/aggbug.ashx?id=de3dd212-1e90-48cf-9bb6-4fbbfd899ba8" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.mindfusioncorp.com/weblog/CommentView,guid,de3dd212-1e90-48cf-9bb6-4fbbfd899ba8.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
      <category>Vista</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>